What Program Directors want: Part 4-Research

Generally, research performance is not looked at until after you are invited for interview. this is a big disadvantage if you are someone who had many meaningful peer-reviewed publications and you are concerned people will not see them.

This is because residency  is a CLINICAL event and most program directors are much, much more concerned that you can function clinically with patients rather than in a lab.

What is ‘Meaningful’ research experience?

It is an experience that results in a publication in the peer reviewed medical literature.

I understand completely that it is VERY difficult to have enough time as a student to do this, but that is why it is a competition.

If you have two students from the same type of school and the scores and transcripts are roughly equal, then research productivity will make a difference.

Research value is VERY subjective. Some directors will make huge value judgements on having publications. Some may value it MORE than the interview.

Also, ‘hanging around’ a lab is not too valuable. A SMALL project you can complete is MUCH more valuable than just ‘participating’ in something big.

Send in your questions.



4 Responses to “What Program Directors want: Part 4-Research”

  1. abdu Says:

    what about the importance of research if the speciality is pathology?

  2. nani Says:

    does research done in another country count? i did a year of research back home to complete the study for my thesis

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: